Here is data for selected sex crimes by ethnicity in the USA. Ethnic groups include both male and female offenders. Numbers in red are the over-representation rates i.e. if the number is >>1.00, it indicates law breaking behavior.
- Exp: expected rate per ethnic group [set at 1.00 or 100%], calculated as the 2010 ethnic group population / total US population x known ethnic offenders.
- A rate of 2.43 means that a group is 2.43 times more likely to commit this crime
Assuming that every ethnic group is equally likely to partake in any type of crime, ‘Africans’ are over-represented in all six sexual crime areas investigated whereas ‘Asians/Pacific Islanders’ (API) and ‘Americans’ (including Inuit) are more law abiding than expected.
The most law abiding group is ‘Asians/Pacific Islanders.’ Those in the ‘Euro/Semites’ group partake in crime almost at the expected rates for their population (1.00 +/- 0.1).
From the data and to make the starkest contrast, compared to APIs, ‘Africans’ are 8.6 times more likely to be forced fondling offenders, 15.2 times to be forced rape offenders, 17.4 times to be forced sodomy offenders, 19.4 times to be incest offenders, 11.7 times to be sexual assault [with an object] offenders and 12.8 times to be statutory rape offenders.
Clearly, something is very wrong in the U.S. African population and these numbers cannot be accounted for with simple claims of Eurocentric racism since other non-European groups do not share such high criminal propensity. The most charitable reason I can think of is Oscar Lewis’ culture of poverty thesis.
NOTE: Statistics for Latinos not provided in source data but this does not affect the above values.